How We Work Engagements → Ground Truth → Commercial Launchpad → Fractional Director VR Intelligence Strategy Hub Markets → United Kingdom → Europe & EMEA → UAE & ADNOC → Saudi Arabia → North America → Scandinavia & Nordics → Eastern Europe → Australia & APAC → South America → EPC Strategy About
Book a Call
Home/Strategy Hub/Getting Qualified by Progress Rail, EMD ...
VR Intelligence

Getting Qualified by Progress Rail, EMD and Wabtec

Three names decide most of what moves on North American rails. Progress Rail, which builds and services EMD locomotives and engines. Wabtec, which owns what used to be GE Transportation. And behind both of them a Class I railroad customer base that changes supplier roughly never.

If you manufacture a component that belongs on a locomotive, those are the doors. Getting qualified behind them is not a sales process in the way most exporters understand the phrase. It is a company audit, then a test programme, then a very long wait, run in that order. Most manufacturers give up somewhere in the middle because nobody told them what they were walking into.

So here is what it actually looks like.

Know who owns what before you send the first email

Progress Rail is a wholly owned Caterpillar subsidiary. It delivers EMD locomotives and engines alongside trackwork, signalling, freight car services and aftermarket parts. When you approach EMD you are approaching Caterpillar. That means Caterpillar supplier expectations, Caterpillar quality gateways and Caterpillar's view of what visibility a supplier owes its customer.

Wabtec acquired GE Transportation in 2019. Progress Rail sued over that acquisition and the two settled the antitrust case in February this year. What matters commercially is the shape it leaves behind. The North American locomotive builder landscape is two deep, both parties vertically integrated, both supplying components as well as whole locomotives. Your prospective customer may also be your competitor on the exact part you are trying to sell them. That is not a reason to stay away. It is a reason to be ruthlessly clear about what your product does that their in house option does not.

The audit lands before anyone looks at your product

Nobody at a locomotive builder evaluates your component before they evaluate your company. That order surprises people every time.

For anything on the AAR register going into North American interchange service, the AAR quality assurance certification is the entry ticket. It is a mandatory quality programme covering manufacturing, procurement, material identification, stock control, packaging and storage. Certification runs three years, with a minimum of two annual compliance audits and a recertification audit at the end of year three. Your quality manual and completed programme evaluation checklist go to an accredited auditor roughly sixty days before the audit itself.

If you are also chasing European rail work, ISO 22163 is the equivalent gate. It was published in July 2023 to replace the earlier technical specification, and since January 2024 it has been run as IRIS Certification Revision 04 by UNIFE. It is ISO 9001 with rail specific requirements bolted on top.

Clear those and you reach part level qualification. First article inspection against the drawing. Production part approval process to prove you can repeat it. Material certification with full lot traceability, dimensional reports, heat treatment records, non destructive testing where the part warrants it.

None of that paperwork wins you an order. All of it wins you the right to be considered for one.

Budget twelve to twenty four months from first serious conversation to first production order, and treat anything faster as a bonus rather than a plan.

The way in is an engineer, and usually a forced redesign

The paperwork is the price of entry. It is not the strategy. The strategy is finding the moment when the builder has to change something anyway.

At Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon I took the business from £2.5M to £15.2M, up 508 percent, and the majority of that came from one observation. Emissions regulation was changing. Engine manufacturers were going to be forced to redesign, which meant every cooling pump on those engines was back in play. So I went round the engine builders globally and opened every conversation on the regulation rather than the product. Marine engines first, then rail, then larger truck engines.

Caterpillar started with their technical team. When I pushed to get into their engine build programme they asked for an open book review of our supply chain. I pushed back hard, eventually yielded, and then presented it in a format that suited us. There were many quality gateways after that, which was normal across most of those customers.

GE started at an exhibition, where they were looking at one of our pumps sitting on a Caterpillar engine. We moved quickly. It began in marine and moved into the locomotive business later, and that locomotive business is Wabtec today. GE sold very few marine engines a year, big units at low volume, so we wanted paying for the design work. Around £150,000 for the design. I closed it, and it was the first time in that company's very long history that it charged for pump design.

Deal control, stakeholder mapping, relentless follow up, face to face meetings and direct engagement with the technical team took the cycle from eighteen to twenty four months down to roughly twelve. Not by rushing anyone. By removing every gap where the process could stall.

Being in the build standard is the biggest lever, not the only route

Getting designed into the build is the single biggest lever you have. It tilts the odds hard, it protects your margin and it hands you the aftermarket that follows. Say it plainly to your board so nobody expects a quick win.

But it is not the only route to revenue, and anyone who tells you otherwise has not sold in this sector. Plenty of business goes to suppliers who were never in the original build standard. It goes on obsolescence cover when the incumbent part disappears. It goes on capacity when a builder cannot get delivery. It goes on local support in a territory the incumbent does not serve properly. It goes on a commercial case that is simply better this year than last. Qualified and available beats specified and late more often than the textbooks admit.

The mistake is treating those as alternatives. They are the same campaign. You qualify because qualification is what makes you callable, then you stay close enough to engineering and purchasing to be the call they make.

Where this leaves you

If rail is on your plan for the next two years, get honest about the sequence. Certification first, because without it you are not in the conversation. Then a technical relationship with a builder who has a reason to change something. Then patience, paid for by a pipeline that does not depend on this one door opening.

If you want a straight read on whether your product, your capacity and your certification position actually stack up for these buyers, that is what the Market Diagnostic is for. Five working days, a clear go or no go, $197. Or take twenty minutes and we will talk it through.

Take the Next Step

Ground Truth is a paid call that gives you an honest go or no-go on your market, direct with Scott. The $250 deposit is credited if you go ahead, and refunded if we are not the right fit.

Get the Ground Truth Talk to Scott
← Back to Strategy Hub Share on LinkedIn →